Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in non-elective major thoracic surgery for infectious lung abscess.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for elective cardiothoracic surgery is well established. In contrast, there are not much data regarding the usefulness and outcome of ECMO in non-elective major lung resections for infectious lung abscess. METHODS: All patients undergoing non-elective major lung surgery for infectious lung abscess at 5 centres in Germany, UK and Spain were enrolled in a prospective database. Malignant disorders and intrathoracic complications of other procedures were excluded. RESULTS: There were 127 patients. The median age was 59 years (interquartile range 18.75). The mean Charlson index of comorbidity was 2.83 (standard deviation 2.57). Surgical procedures were lobectomy (89), pneumectomy (20) and segmentectomy (18). ECMO was used for 10 patients (pneumectomy 2, lobectomy 8) and several more received pre-ECMO treatment. Mortality was 17/127. Intraoperatively no ECMO-associated complications were encountered. EMCO [1/10 vs 16/117; odds ratio (OR): 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-5.91, P = 0.74] and the extent of pulmonary resection were not associated with higher mortality. Preoperative sepsis (OR: 17.84, 95% CI 2.29-139.28, P < 0.01), preoperative air leak (OR: 13.12, 95% CI 4.10-42.07, P < 0.001), acute renal failure (OR: 7.00, 95% CI 2.19-22.43, P < 0.01) and Charlson index of comorbidity ≥3 (OR: 10.83, 95% CI 2.36-49.71, P < 0.01) were associated with significantly higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The application of ECMO is widening the possibilities for successful surgical management of infectious, non-malignant lung abscesses. Particularly, patients with marginal functional operability benefit from the availability and readiness to use ECMO. Mortality is determined by the burden of pre-existent comorbidity, severe sepsis and septic shock.

Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hybrid laparoscopic techniques have been proposed as a good transition from open to complete minimally invasive approach especially in complex surgical procedures. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of hybrid laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature research was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A broad search strategy with terms "laparoscopy" and "pancreatoduodenectomy" was used. Included studies were analyzed by quantitative meta-analysis using the metafor package for R software. RESULTS: Of 655 identified articles, 627 were excluded and 28 articles fully assessed, including 14 comparative studies, 8 case series and 6 case reports. Extracted data included intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome parameters. The predefined inclusion criteria were met by 14 comparative studies, and 371 patients were pooled in the meta-analysis. Hybrid laparoscopic pacreatoduodenectomy was associated with significantly longer operative time (I2 0%, p = 0,01, Mean HPD 494,6 min, Mean OPD 421,6 min, WMD 67 min, 95% CI 14-120 min). For all other postoperative outcome parameters, no statistically significant differences were found. A nonsignificant reduction in intraoperative transfusion rate (I2 20%, p = 0,2, proportion HPD 2%, proportion OPD 1,6%, OR 0,44, 95% CI 0,16-1,27) and blood loss (I2 95%, p = 0,1, Mean HPD 397,2 ml, Mean OPD 1017,8 ml, MD - 601 ml, 95% CI - 1311-108) was observed for hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy in comparison to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates significantly increased operation time for hybrid laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy. Intraoperative variables as well as postoperative parameters and major morbidity were comparable for both techniques. Overall results of this meta-analysis demonstrated the hybrid technique as a safe procedure in high-volume centers offering aspects of a safe transition to fully laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Intraoperative conversion and complications in robotic assisted primary and redo gastric bypass surgery.

The rise of robotic assisted surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese patients has enlarged the armamentarium for surgeons involved in bariatric surgery. This in particular is of great advantage not only in primary cases, but also in patients undergoing revisional procedures following preceding upper GI surgery. In the following, our experience with intraoperative conversions and complications in revisional robotic surgery using the Da Vinci robotic system will be reported and compared to primary robotic bypass surgery and the literature. In a 36-month period, a total of 157 minimally invasive bariatric procedures (48 robotic assisted, 109 laparoscopic) were performed. Out of 43 patients receiving a gastric bypass 32 (74%) were performed robotically. Out of these 20 (62.5%) had previous operations (RRBP): one hiatal mesh repair, one open Mason operation, eight gastric band, nine gastric sleeve, one sleeve with fundoplication. The Da Vinci Xi was used for all surgeries. 3/20 (15%) RRBP were converted to open laparotomy because of a huge left liver lobe (1), extreme adhesions (1) and short mesentery (1) (p = 0.631 vs 1/12 RBP). One out of these had to be reoperated for an insufficiency of the gastroenterostomy. 3/17 (23%) patients (RRBP) without conversion had complications: hemorrhage (1), insufficiency of biliodigestive anastomosis (1), insufficiency of gastroenterostomy (1). There was no mortality and length of hospital stay was 3.5 days in uncomplicated cases and 12.3 days in complicated cases (p < 0.05). This preliminary experience suggests, that robotic revisional surgery can be performed safely even in complicated cases. Conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery may be required when adverse anatomical conditions are present. However, the incidence of complications was not increased when conversion was performed. In this series, the incidence of complications was not greater in case of revisional surgery.

Minimally Invasive Conversion of a Gastric Bypass into Sleeve Gastrectomy for Postprandial Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia.

The treatment of postprandial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia following gastric bypass surgery for obesity can be challenging despite dietetic and medical treatment and eventually surgical treatment remains the exclusive treatment to resolve the problem for the patient. In the following, the experience with a conversion surgery from a complicated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to sleeve gastrectomy using the Da Vinci robotic system will be reported.

Hybrid robotic versus hybrid laparoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a case-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Robotic-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer has been increasingly employed worldwide; however, the benefits of this technique compared to conventional minimally invasive oesophagectomy are unclear. Since 2016, hybrid robotic minimally invasive oesophagectomy (R-HMIE) has increasingly replaced hybrid laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE) as the standard of care in our institution. The aim of this study was to compare these procedures. METHODS: Over a 10-year period, 686 patients underwent oesophagectomy at our institution. Out of these patients, 128 patients with cancer were treated with a hybrid minimally invasive technique. Each patient who underwent R-HMIE was matched according to gender, age, comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Union International Contre le Cancer stage, localization, histology and neoadjuvant treatment with a patient who underwent HMIE. Perioperative parameters were extracted from our database and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: After the matching procedure, 88 patients were included in the study. Between HMIE and R-HMIE, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were found in operating time (median 281 vs 300 min), R0 resection rate (n = 42 vs 42), harvested lymph nodes (median 28 vs 24), hospital stay (median 19 vs 17 days) and intensive care unit stay (median 7 vs 6.5 days). Regarding surgical complications, no difference could be observed either (n = 42 vs 44). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive oesophagectomy remains a challenging operation with high morbidity even in a high-volume institution. According to our intra- and short-term results, we have found no difference between R-HMIE and HMIE.

Prognostic Value of Chest-Tube Amylase Versus C-Reactive Protein as Screening Tool for Detection of Early Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy are a significant cause of morbidity and death. Early detection and timely management are crucial. This study evaluates the effectiveness of daily drain amylase levels in detecting early leaks after esophagectomy compared with C-reactive protein (CRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2015 and September 2017, 126 esophagectomies were performed in our department. Amylase levels were collected in 80 of these patients, as long right-sided chest tubes were in place. Mostly, chest tubes were removed before postoperative day (POD) 5. CRP levels were measured daily. Early leaks were defined as occurring with the chest tubes in place. According to the obtained receiver operating characteristics curves, amylase levels >335 U/L, and CRP >30 mg/dL were considered positive. Sensitivity and specificity for both drain amylase and CRP were calculated. RESULTS: Overall anastomotic leak rate was 7.5% (6/80). An early disruption occurred in 4 of 80 patients (5%). Three patients had a positive amylase level and none a positive CRP on POD 1. These 3 patients had on POD 2 a positive CRP. The fourth patient presented at POD 2 bilious secretion in the chest tubes. He showed normal amylase and CRP levels on POD 1. Sensitivity and specificity for amylase level and CRP within the first 3 PODs were 0.75 and 0.98 versus 0.75 and 0.85, respectively. The patients with leak were reoperated at POD 2. They were all discharged between PODs 15 and 19. CONCLUSIONS: Amylase level after esophagectomy is a more accurate screening tool for detection of early leaks than CRP. It could facilitate their detection up to 24 hours earlier than CRP.

Traumatic oesophageal perforation: a successful management based on the Pittsburgh Perforation Severity Score.

Oesophageal perforation is a severe life-threatening clinical condition with high mortality and morbidity needing rapid interdisciplinary approach to be effectively managed. Recently, on the basis of multicentric retrospective data, we proposed a decision tree for the treatment of oesophageal perforations based on the Pittsburgh Perforation Severity Score (PSS). We now report the first case of a traumatic oesophageal perforation, which was successfully treated according to the application of the PSS decision tree.

Gastric carcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy for obesity.

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of cancer development in the upper gastrointestinal tract. We present the case of a female patient with gastric carcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy. Before bariatric surgery, one rationale for performing routine endoscopy is to detect clinically relevant conditions with the potential to change the surgical procedure. After bariatric surgery in symptomatic patients and in patients with unspecific symptoms, early upper endoscopy should be performed to detect potential carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Predictors of Outcome in Modern Surgery for Lung Abscess.

Background Surgery for lung abscess is a challenging task. Timing and indications for surgery are not well established. Identification of predictors of outcome could help to clarify the role of surgery. Methods Patients who underwent major thoracic surgery for infectious lung abscess were identified at six centers for general thoracic surgery in Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Study period was 2000 to 2016. Results There were 91 patients. Pulmonary sepsis (48), pleural empyema (43), persistent air leakage (25), acute renal failure (12), and respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation (25) were already preoperatively present. The mean Charlson index of comorbidity was 3.0 (median: 2.0; interquartile range: 3). Procedures were segmentectomy (18), lobectomy (58), and pneumonectomy (15). The 30-day mortality following surgery was 13/91.Preoperative sepsis (odds ratio [OR]: 13.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86-610.53; p < 0.01), preoperative persistent air leak (OR: 13.46, 95% CI: 3.00-85.37, p < 0.01), respiratory failure (OR: 5.60; 95% CI: 1.41-24.84; p < 0.01), acute renal failure (OR: 6.15 ; 95% CI: 1.24-29.56 ; p = 0.01), and Charlson index of comorbidity ≥ 3 (OR: 7.19 ; 95% CI: 1.43-71.21 ; p < 0.01) are associated with higher mortality, whereas age > 70 years (p = 0.46) and the extent of pulmonary resection (segmentectomy, lobectomy, pneumonectomy) have no significant influence on mortality. Patients with fatal outcome have significantly higher Charlson index of comorbidity (p < 0.01). Conclusions Delayed referral for surgery is common. Significant predictors for fatal outcome are pulmonary sepsis, septic complications (air leak, pleural empyema), septic organ failure (respiratory, acute renal failure), and preexisting comorbidity (Charlson index of comorbidity ≥ 3). The extent of surgical resection shows no significant influence.

Spotlight on esophageal perforation: A multinational study using the Pittsburgh esophageal perforation severity scoring system.

OBJECTIVE: The Pittsburgh group has suggested a perforation severity score (PSS) for better decision making in the management of esophageal perforation. Our study aim was to determine whether the PSS can be used to stratify patients with esophageal perforation into distinct subgroups with differential outcomes in an independent study population. METHODS: In a retrospective study cases of esophageal perforation were collected (study-period, 1990-2014). The PSS was analyzed using logistic regression as a continuous variable and stratified into low, intermediate, and high score groups. RESULTS: Data for 288 patients (mean age, 59.9 years) presenting with esophageal perforation (during the period 1990-2014) were abstracted. Etiology was spontaneous (Boerhaave; n = 119), iatrogenic (instrumentation; n = 85), and traumatic perforation (n = 84). Forty-three patients had coexisting esophageal cancer. The mean PSS was 5.82, and was significantly higher in patients with fatal outcome (n = 57; 19.8%; mean PSS, 9.79 vs 4.84; P < .001). Mean PSS was also significantly higher in patients receiving operative management (n = 200; 69%; mean PSS, 6.44 vs 4.40; P < .001). Using the Pittsburgh strata, patients were assigned to low PSS (≤2; n = 63), intermediate PSS (3-5; n = 86), and high PSS (>5; n = 120) groups. Perforation-related morbidity, length of stay, frequency of operative treatment, and mortality increased with increasing PSS strata. Patients with high PSS were 3.37 times more likely to have operative management compared with low PSS. CONCLUSIONS: The Pittsburgh PSS reliably reflects the seriousness of esophageal perforation and stratifies patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with differential morbidity and mortality outcomes.

Surgery for parapneumonic pleural empyema--What influence does the rising prevalence of multimorbidity and advanced age has on the current outcome?

OBJECTIVE: Pleural empyema is a critical condition. In the western world the share of sufferers with multiple comorbidities and advanced age is rapidly increasing. METHODS: This retrospective study comprises all patients who underwent surgery for parapneumonic pleural empyema at a major center for thoracic surgery in Germany between January 2006 and April 2013. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients (mean age 60.4 years) were included. The average ASA grade was 2.8. Empyema stage 1, 2 and 3 (classification of the American Thoracic Society) was encountered in 30, 230 and 75 cases, respectively. The most common comorbidities were cardiac disorders (124), diabetes mellitus (76), COPD (66) and alcoholism (54). The mean Charlson index of comorbidity score was 2. Minimally invasive surgery was feasible in 290 cases. A total of 88 patients sustained pulmonary sepsis. The overall mortality was 29/335 (8.7%). The occurrence of pulmonary sepsis (OR: 17.95; 95% CI: 6.38-62.69; p < 0.001), respiratory failure (OR: 23.08; 95% CI: 8.52-73.35; p < 0.001) and acute renal failure (OR: 8.20; 95% CI: 3.18-20.80; p < 0.001) and Charlson score ≥ 3 (OR: 6.65; 95% CI: 2.76-17.33; p < 0.001) were associated with higher mortality. On the other hand, very elderly sufferers (≥80 years) showed neither higher odds for pulmonary sepsis (OR: 0.78) nor for fatal outcome (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.22-2.86; p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Parapneumonic pleural empyema is still associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Pre-existing comorbidity, the occurrence of pulmonary sepsis and sepsis related complications have a determining influence on the results whereas advanced age itself shows no higher risk for adverse outcome. Further improvement seems achievable by earlier surgical intervention before the onset of pulmonary sepsis.

Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus in a Patient With a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: First of Many to Come?

Recently an alternative treatment option utilizing a laparoscopically placed magnetic sphincter device has been introduced for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients who are hesitant to undergo Nissen-fundoplication. Based on previous experience with similar devices, concerns have been raised about migration, and in case of a subsequently developing esophageal cancer, technical challenges during the endoscopic or surgical treatment caused by the foreign body reaction around the abdominal esophagus. In this article, we report of the first case of esophagectomy for cancer in a patient with a previously implanted magnetic sphincter augmentation device.

Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgically Resected T1 Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The application of endoscopic therapies for early cancers of the esophagus is limited by the possible presence of regional lymph node metastases. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and predictors of lymph node metastases in patients with pT1 carcinoma of the esophagus and the gastric cardia. METHODS: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database (2004 to 2010) was used to identify all patients with pT1 carcinomas who underwent primary surgical resection for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (EAC) of the esophagus and of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Prevalence of lymph node metastases was assessed, and survival in all types of cancer was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors predicting positive lymph node status. RESULTS: There were 1,225 patients (84% male), with a mean age of 64 ± 10 years, and 90% were white. Intramucosal disease was present in 44% of patients, and submucosal invasion (T1b) was present in 692 (56%). Prevalence of lymph node metastases in EAC, SCC, and AEG was 6.4%, 6.9%, and 9.5% for pT1a tumors and 19.6%, 20%, and 22.9% for pT1b tumors, respectively. In patients with more than 23 lymph nodes removed during resection, prevalence of lymph node metastases in EAC, SCC, and AEG was 8.1%, 25%, and 7.4% for pT1a tumors and 27.8%, 33.3%, and 22% for pT1b tumors, respectively. Positive lymph node status was associated with worse overall 5-year survival in EAC (N0 vs N+: 78% vs 52%) and AEG (N0 vs N+: 83% vs 44%) but did not have a significant effect on the long-term survival of patients with SCC. Infiltration of the submucosa, tumor size exceeding 10 mm, and poor tumor differentiation were independently associated with the risk of nodal disease. Prevalence of lymph node metastasis negative for these three risk factors was only 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of lymph node metastasis in early esophageal cancer is high in patients with T1 cancer. Inadequate lymphadenectomy underestimates lymph node status. Endoscopic treatment can be considered only in a select group of patients with early esophageal cancer.

One decade of experience with endoscopic stenting for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: brilliant breakthrough or flash in the pan?

Management of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy by means of endoscopic stent insertion has gained wide acceptance as an alternative to surgical reintervention. Between January 2004 and March 2013 all patients who underwent esophagectomy at a German high-volume center for esophageal surgery were included in this retrospective study. The study comprises 356 patients. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 49 cases. There were no significant differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, or frequency of neoadjuvant therapy between cases with and without leak. However, leak patients sustained significantly more often postoperative pneumonia, pleural empyema, sepsis, and acute renal failure. Moreover, leak victims had higher odds for fatal outcome (16 of 49 vs 33 of 307; odds ratio, 5.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.65 to 13.15; P < 0.0001). The leakage was amendable by endoscopic stenting in 29 cases, whereas rethoracotomy was mandatory in 20 patients. Between stent and rethoracotomy cases, we observed no significant differences in age, ASA score, neoadjuvant therapy, occurrence of pneumonia, pleural empyema, or tracheostomy rate. Rethoracotomy patients sustained more often sepsis (16 of 20 vs 14 of 29; P = 0.04) and acute renal failure (nine of 20 vs four of 29; P = 0.02) as expression of more severe septic disease. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in mortality (seven of 29 vs nine of 20; P = 0.21). Furthermore, we observed three cases of stent-related aortic erosion with peracute death from exsanguination. Despite being the preferred treatment option, endoscopic stenting was only feasible in approximately 60 per cent of all intrathoracic leaks. The results are marred by the occurrence of deadly vascular erosion. Therefore, individualized strategies should be preferred to a general recommendation for endoscopic stenting.

Emergent pneumonectomy for lung gangrene: does the outcome warrant the procedure?

BACKGROUND: Sloughing and gangrene of a complete lung are only very infrequently encountered complications of necrotizing pneumonia and fulminant pulmonary abscess formation. Thus far the role of emergent pneumonectomy is not established. METHODS: The outcome of patients who underwent anatomic lung resection for lung gangrene at 3 centers for thoracic surgery during the last 13 years was retrospectively analyzed. Only cases of necrotizing pneumonia were included whereas malignant lesions were excluded. RESULTS: Overall 44 patients were indentified (average age 56.3 years). Pulmonary sepsis (27 of 44), pleural empyema (29 of 44), persistent air leakage (14 of 44), and respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation (14 of 44) were present preoperatively. The mean Charlson comorbidity index was 2.77. Procedures were segmentectomy (7), lobectomy (26), and pneumonectomy (11). In-hospital mortality was 7 of 44; 2 following pneumonectomy and 5 after lobectomy. In comparing the pneumonectomy group with the lobectomy group we found no significant differences in age (p=0.59), Charlson comorbidity index (p=0.18), and postoperative mortality (p=1). Charlson comorbidity index 3 or greater (odds ratio [OR], 8.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 421.71; p=0.04), preoperative pleural empyema (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 0.37 to 179.62; p=0.39) and preoperative persistent air leak (OR, 7.34; 95% CI, 1.00 to 89.98; p=0.02) were associated with higher risk for fatal outcome. Furthermore, patients with sepsis (p=0.03) and patients sustaining acute renal failure (p=0.04) had significantly higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary sepsis and its complications as well as preexisting comorbidity are the major reasons for fatal outcome, whereas the extent of surgical resection shows no significant influence. Emergent pneumonectomy as ultimate ratio is not only justified but also life saving. Further improvement seems achievable by earlier surgical intervention before the onset of pulmonary sepsis.

Prevalence and topography of lymph node metastases in early esophageal and gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and localization of lymph node metastases in patients with pT1 carcinoma of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction, and stomach. BACKGROUND: Retrospective analysis and topographic description. METHODS: We included 793 consecutive patients with pT1 carcinomas who underwent primary surgery for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus, adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), or gastric cancer (GC). Clinical records and pathology reports were reviewed, and the prevalence and topography of lymph node metastases were identified. RESULTS: The prevalence of lymph node metastases in SCC, AEG, and GC was 7%, 0%, and 5% for pT1a tumors and 24%, 18%, and 14% for pT1b tumors, respectively. Positive lymph node status was associated with worse overall survival (P<0.001). Not only infiltration of the submucosa (P=0.002) but also lymphatic vessel invasion (P<0.001), multifocal tumor growth (P=0.001), lower patient age (P=0.001), and poor tumor differentiation (P=0.05) were associated with nodal disease. These 5 parameters allowed the compilation of a nomogram to estimate the individual risk of lymph node metastases. In SCC, lymph node metastases were found from the neck to the celiac axis. In AEG, nodal disease was limited to the lower mediastinum and the D1 compartment. In GC, lymphatic spread exceeded the D1 compartment in 7% of node positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Risk estimation for lymph node metastases should not be based on depth of tumor infiltration alone but additional clinicopathological parameters should also be considered. The extent of lymphadenectomy in surgical procedures should respect the presented topography of lymph node metastases.

Recurrent oesophageal cancer complicated by tracheo-oesophageal fistula: improved palliation by means of parallel tracheal and oesophageal stenting.

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent oesophageal carcinoma complicated by the development of a tracheo-oesophageal fistula is a crushing condition. In this situation, endoscopic double stenting may provide a quick and safe option for palliation. METHODS: The outcomes of patients who received endoscopic parallel stent implantation for tracheo-oesophageal fistula due to recurrent oesophageal cancer at a German tertiary referral hospital between 2006 and 2013 were reviewed in a retrospective case study. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients were identified (mean age 59.9 years). Tumour entity was squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine cancer of the oesophagus in 5, 3 and 1 case, respectively. The mean interval between primary treatment and recurrence was 19.2 months. Successful double-stent placement was always feasible. Complete closure of the communication between oesophagus and respiratory system was accomplished in all cases by stent implantation. There were no stent-associated complications. The mean survival following stent insertion was 64 days (6-121 days). After successful double stenting, 5 patients were fit enough to receive palliative chemo- or radiotherapy. Seven patients were finally discharged home after adequate oral intake had been achieved. Fatal aspiration pneumonia with respiratory failure occurred in 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic parallel stent implantation provides an easy and ubiquitous available technique for closure and palliation of tracheo-oesophageal fistula caused by recurrent oesophageal cancer. Immediate sealing of the fistula and relief of symptoms related to aspiration is achieved while hazardous operations are avoided. Therefore, we recommend endoscopic parallel stent insertion as the treatment of choice in case of tracheo-oesophageal fistula caused by recurrent oesophageal cancer.

Tracheal bronchus associated with recurrent pneumonia.

Abnormalities of the major airways are very uncommon congenital conditions which occur in approximately 2% of the adult population. Usually aberrant bronchi are asymptomatic and are only found by coincidence. We present the rare case of a 49-years-old woman with a tracheal bronchus causing associated with recurrent pneumonia of the right upper lobe.

Times and trends in the treatment of spontaneous perforation of the esophagus: from Herman Boerhaave to the present age.

Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus is a rare devastating condition, which was first described by Herman Boerhaave in 1724. Only a handful of cases were recorded during the 18th and 19th centuries. Diagnosis was usually obtained on autopsy. Only in 1914 Irving Walker achieved the first antemortem diagnosis of spontaneous rupture of the esophagus. The dawn of thoracic surgery during the first decades of the 20th century opened up the way for operative cure. More than 200 years after Boerhaave's initial report, Barrett as well as Clagett and Olsen independently accomplished the first successful surgical treatment by primary repair of the esophageal lesion in 1947. Since those pioneer days, various suggestions for proper treatment have been made ranging from conservative, nonoperative means to extended procedures such as esophagectomy. Invention of minimally invasive surgery and endoscopic measures has further broadened the spectrum of available therapeutic options. The aim of this history article is to outline the development of diagnosis and management of spontaneous rupture of the esophagus from the age of Herman Boerhaave to the present times.